Please either log in below,
or create an account.
I wrote a response to the recent poll about this issue in the Great Lakes Town Hall. I initially advocated the placement of the hypothetical park along western Lake Erie. After receiving an email on this issue, I have since changed my stance.
The email proposed that the park be a multi-unit facility with the respective units being located at strategic points along crucial tributaries and wetlands of the Great Lakes. The wisdom of this, to me, is far too sensible to remain obscure. Placement of these units would allow several states and communities to share in the many benefits of a National Park; allowing greater access of the general populace to the wonders of our lakes.
Some of the benefits our region could gain would be in various forms, such as:
Create sub-regional units of the park system that would provide reasonable access to various population centers spread throughout the region. This strategy would minimize the perceived impact on private lands, enhance local conservation efforts, stimulating economic and regional growth for multiple communities and benefiting more than just one state or lake.
This could be done much in the way the John Day Fossil Bed National Monument (NPS units) of Oregon are operated and managed.
Re-establish our geographical heritage with redevelopment of land in key areas back to native species and habitat.
Foster our common culture; acknowledging the major cultures that dominated the early landscape. These range from the First Nations to the French, Scots, Irish, British, German, Dutch, Scandinavian, Polish and their various traditions that carry on to this day. This should include the Amish, Mennonite and Mormon movements.
Celebrate our history; evolving from the “Old Northwest” with its rich multi-tribal heritage to the French Voyageur, settlers, scoundrels, canal-diggers and conflicts that forged this region.
Provide recreation and leisure opportunities to millions of Great Lakes residents (and tourists) who desire a re-connection to the natural world around them. Again, this provides for a more sustainable economy with limited impact on regional resources.
Protect the headwaters and drinking water resources that dot the region. Strategic placement of park lands affecting these crucial waterways would go to great length in providing a solid foundation of habitat and water quality that flows into the privately-held reaches of our rivers, streams and lakes.
I am curious to hear your responses. What are the challenges, options and opportunities a Great Lakes park system could provide?
[b]
Comments
Great Lakes National Park
I like both ideas. Lake Erie deserves a national park of its own; it has features unique in the system, and an interesting history. What better place to teach about the beauty and fragility of the Lakes?
But the multi-unit idea sounds terrific, too. Perhaps even a binational multi-unit park.
Bi-national Park
Dave,
I think the notion of a bi-national park is a timely one.
I also agree that it is about time that Lake Erie gets a national park. I think that a chain of parks stretching from upstate New York to upstate Wisconsin/Minnesota, say about 12 units, would be sufficient to help protect ecosystems in every lake and place at least one unit in every Great Lakes state.
Matt Jones
"With water, we are blessed and cursed; Both by it's excesses and our thirst" -self, 2007
headwaters park
Over the weekend it also occurred to me that it would be great to have a state or regional park that celebrates and tells the story of a headwaters region of the Great Lakes. Perhaps in NE Indiana. When people think of the "Great Lakes" they tend to think of big open waters and not the many streams that feed them.
Headwaters
Ironically, that would be the area where I live. The Maumee River is the largest tributary and watershed in the Great Lakes region. The Maumee originates less than 1/2 mi. from where I live.
I've never really though about it much, but we are fairly centrally located for the Great Lakes. Any spot north or east of here drains into one of the lakes. We are located 150mi. from L. Michigan, 110mi. from L. Erie, and about 150mi. from L. Huron.
Our interstate runs into lower Michigan to connect with the other highways that run up the spine of the L.P., over the Mackinac Straits and up to Sault Sainte Marie and Ontario. I can't think of another area outside of Michigan (a peninsula) that is better connected to the Great Lakes region.
O.k., then it would make sense to have one of those N.P. units located here, right? Remember this and help me defend it if it ever comes to a vote, please.
It all stems from having a watershed mentality.
Thanks for responding to my post. I look forward to engaging you in future discussions.
Matt Jones
"With water, we are blessed and cursed; Both by it's excesses and our thirst" -self, 2007